Response to
Intervention (RTI):
A
major concern for parents as well as teachers is how to help children
who experience difficulty in school. All parents want to see their
child excel, and it can be very frustrating when a child falls behind
in either learning to read, achieving as expected in math and other
subjects, or in getting along socially with peers and teachers.
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-step approach to providing
services and interventions to struggling learners at increasing
levels of intensity. RTI allows for early intervention by providing
academic and behavioral supports rather than waiting for a child to
fail before offering help.
Some
new federal laws have directed schools to focus more on helping all
children learn by addressing problems earlier, before the child is so
far behind that a referral to special education services is
warranted. These laws include the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
and the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act
(IDEA) of 2004. Both laws underscore the importance of providing high
quality, scientifically-based instruction and interventions, and hold
schools accountable for the progress of all students in terms of
meeting state grade level standards. RTI is a process designed to
help schools focus on these high quality interventions while
carefully monitoring student progress. The information gained from an
RTI process is used by school personnel and parents to inform
instruction and to determine the educational needs of the child.
What
are the essential components of RTI?
Simply,
"Response to Intervention" refers to a process that
emphasizes how well students respond to changes in instruction. The
essential elements of an RTI approach are: the provision of
scientific, research-based instruction and interventions in general
education; monitoring and measurement of student progress in response
to the instruction and interventions; and use of these measures of
student progress to shape instruction and make educational decisions.
A number of leading national organizations and coalition groups,
including the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities and
the 14 organizations forming the 2004 Learning Disabilities (LD)
Roundtable coalition, have outlined the core features of an RTI
process as follows:
High quality, research-based
instruction and behavioral support in general education.
Universal (school-wide or
district-wide) screening of academics and behavior in order to
determine which students need closer monitoring or additional
interventions.
Multiple tiers of increasingly
intense scientific, research-based interventions that are matched to
student need.
Use of a collaborative approach
by school staff for development, implementation, and monitoring of
the intervention process.
Continuous monitoring of student
progress during the interventions, using objective information to
determine if students are meeting goals.
Follow-up measures providing
information that the intervention was implemented as intended and
with appropriate consistency.
Documentation of parent
involvement throughout the process.
Documentation that the special
education evaluation timelines specified in IDEA 2004 and in the
state regulations are followed unless both the parents and the
school team agree to an extension.
What
are the key terms?
Response
to Intervention (RTI) is an array of procedures that can be used to
determine if and how students respond to specific changes in
instruction. RTI provides an improved process and structure for
school teams in designing, implementing, and evaluating educational
interventions.
Universal
Screening is a step taken by school personnel early in the school
year to determine which students are "at risk" for not
meeting grade level standards or those who have behavioral or
emotional problems that may interfere with their learning. Universal
screening can be accomplished by reviewing recent results of state
tests, or by administering an academic or behavioral screening test
to all students in a given grade level. Those students whose test
scores or screening results fall below a certain cut-off are
identified as needing more specialized academic or behavioral
interventions.
Student
Progress Monitoring is a scientifically based practice that is used
to frequently assess students' academic performance and evaluate the
effectiveness of instruction. Progress monitoring procedures can be
used with individual students or an entire class.
Scientific,
Research-Based Instruction refers to specific curriculum and
educational interventions that have been proven to be effective -
that is, the research has been reported in scientific, peer-reviewed
journals.
What
role does RTI play in special education eligibility?
IDEA
2004 offers greater flexibility to school teams by eliminating the
requirement that students must exhibit a "severe discrepancy"
between intellectual ability and achievement in order to be found
eligible for special education and related services as a student with
a learning disability. This increased flexibility has led to a
growing interest in using RTI as part of an alternative method to
traditional ability/achievement discrepancy comparisons. IDEA 2004
addresses RTI procedures within several contexts.
Effective
instruction and progress monitoring. For students to be considered
for special education services based on a learning disability they
first must have been provided with effective instruction and their
progress measured through "data-based documentation of repeated
assessments of achievement." Furthermore, results of the student
progress monitoring must be provided to the child's parents.
Evaluation
procedures. The law gives districts the option of using RTI
procedures as part of the evaluation procedures for special education
eligibility. Comprehensive assessment is still required under the
reauthorized law, however. That means that schools still need to
carefully examine all relevant aspects of a student's performance and
history before concluding that a disability does or does not exist.
As before, schools must rule out learning problems that are primarily
the result of factors such as poor vision, hearing, mental
retardation, emotional disturbance, lack of appropriate instruction,
or limited English proficiency.
Early
Intervening Services. IDEA 2004 allows districts the option of using
up to 15% of federal special education funds for "early
intervening services" for students who have not been identified
as needing special education, but who need additional academic and
behavioral support to succeed in the general education setting. The
types of services that can be included are central to the RTI
process, and include professional development for teachers and school
staff to enable them to deliver scientifically based academic and
behavioral interventions, as well as educational evaluations,
services, supports, and scientifically based literacy instruction.
What
are the potential benefits of RTI?
Perhaps
the most commonly cited benefit of an RTI approach is that it
eliminates a "wait to fail" situation because students get
help promptly within the general education setting. Secondly, an RTI
approach has the potential to reduce the number of students referred
for special education services while increasing the number of
students who are successful within regular education. Since an RTI
approach helps distinguish between those students whose achievement
problems are due to a learning disability versus those students whose
achievement problems are due to other issues such as lack of prior
instruction, referrals for special education evaluations are often
reduced. RTI techniques have been favored for reducing the likelihood
that students from diverse racial, cultural or linguistic backgrounds
are incorrectly identified as having a disability. Finally, parents
and school teams alike find that the student progress monitoring
techniques utilized in an RTI approach provide more instructionally
relevant information than traditional assessments.
What
are next steps in implementing RTI approaches?
There
are many specific issues that must be addressed in order to
effectively implement RTI approaches. Strong leadership and effective
collaboration are essential ingredients in implementing RTI. Schools
must be prepared to offer a variety of proven instructional
strategies; staff must be trained to measure student performance
using methods that are sensitive to small increments of growth;
parents must be kept informed of these new procedures and made
partners in the process. RTI is an educational approach that has the
potential to help all students reach their full potential and to
successfully meet the state grade level standards.
|